BIGUNS!

Jeff H

NW Ohio
I prefer smaller knives for general use, but I have a few which are quite large as well. Anything in between fits into the "neither fish nor fowl" category for me - too big to be handy and too small (short) to chop (effectively.

Left to right: USMC Corpsman's Knife, Terrava Skramma, Tramontina Short Machete

The Corpsman's knife was a childhood toy of mine, passed to me by my dad, who got it from his dad, who found one evening that a couple of them had followed him home from the Clyde Cutlery, where he worked. This was after WWII, so no Marine Corpsman went without. If my history is correct, the Army came up with this for Medics in the Philippines for chopping bamboo to make litters and shelters. It weighs TWO POUNDS and is a quarter-inch thick at the spine. To this day, I split my kindling with this beast.

The Skramma is a Finnish knife. It's a fair bit lighter that the Corpsman's knife and more versatile, but still one serious chunk of steel. I much prefer it over a golok and it has become a much-used and favored knife. It will take a shaving-sharp edge and hold it through many beatings. Very impressive design as it is easy to handle - easy to control and does not fatigue you like the Corpsman's knife.



The Tram' was a gift from Reuben Boliue, who writes for a few of the knife magazines. He brought it back from Peru for me for having made some sheaths for him to take along for jungle training.

biguns (Copy).jpg
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
I prefer smaller knives for general use, but I have a few which are quite large as well. Anything in between fits into the "neither fish nor fowl" category for me - too big to be handy and too small (short) to chop (effectively.

i'm with you up to this point,, then a blank stare develops.
 

Jeff H

NW Ohio
Personal preference. A 5" or 6" blade puts the tip too far away for paring and carving. I use the first few inches of the blade, closest to my grip for heavy cuts, so the extra length does nothing for me. I don't have to process game larger than whitetail deer, rassle bears or engage duels on sandbars either.;)

The larger stuff I posted a pic of is really an entirely different class of cutting tool too though, so for me to say "anything BETWEEN" might be a bit inaccurate.

Again, this is a personal preference thing. I have nothing against knives longer than 4", they just don't suit my uses. It seems hypocritical then for me to post a picture of some really large blades I really like, hence to qualifying statement.

I'm with @RicinYakima on the axe or saw too for general outdoor use, and I'm talking an axe (28"), NOT a "hatchet, with a total weight of 3 to 3.5#. If 28" is too cumbersome, and I'm not going to be deep in the wild for month, that Skramma will do a lot of work for something that takes up so little room.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
I share the viewpoint that a big knife is a specialized tool, and therefore not my favorite tool.

When seeking larger knives, you reach a level where an axe or saw is really the better tool. I believe the big knives (like the Corpsman knife exhibited by the OP) exist to fill the role of a specialized tool while still standing in for a smaller knife when needed. It’s not an optimal solution but if you’re limited in what you can carry, that’s often the only solution.

As for the axe v. hatchet discussion, I’m with Jeff & Rick on the roles of those tools but with an exception. My father had a small axe that I believe was technically a “Miner’s Axe”. It was larger than a hatchet but not quite the size of a regular axe. It was an incredibly useful tool and very different from the toys so often encountered in that class. I have no idea where it went.

Like Jeff, I gravitate towards a smaller/shorter blade whenever I can. You have more control and a small knife is just far more useful.