You've already had answers from the "pros".... my take on it is that it's not necessarily "easier"... just a different method. And, to me, if done successfully ( I WILL figure this out) it gives you a better product. No leading, no smoke (indoor ranges) and it seems that you don't have to have pristine cast bullets. A few wrinkles are no big deal, they get covered up.Not trying to start an argument, I'm really not, but I just read through this whole thread and can someone please expalin to me again how this is supposed to be easier than traditional sizing and lubing. Never done it before, but reading about all the hoops you guys are havingtojump through makes me tired without evendoing it.
And...So, three times the steps plus cooking time.
You know how casting boils down to spoon the hot metal into the hot form let it cool and load it ? With 10,000 little things we do without any real thought about it , until you write it all out then it looks a lot more complicated than it is . Same thing. I'd use it if I were shooting gobs of specific RB or something like .490s sized down to .452 or something.Not trying to start an argument, I'm really not, but I just read through this whole thread and can someone please expalin to me again how this is supposed to be easier than traditional sizing and lubing. Never done it before, but reading about all the hoops you guys are havingtojump through makes me tired without evendoing it.
Yeah, I'm sure I'll still keep lubing some... if I can get the coating to work, I imagine that most of my bullets will receive that treatment. I don't shoot thousands a month... more like 500 a month, so either way, I'm not investing a huge amount of time.Think I'll stick to traditional ways. About the only advantage I can se is adding diameter, which is certainly a plus in some situations.