Lots of interesting projects, from several of you guys. My stuff was not something I want to discuss online.
If we ever get together, we can jaw about it, just not much for splattering all my life details online where it may
cause me some problems some day.
I know what you mean, Ian. Some of what I worked on, I had a general idea what it might be useful for, but while
I was making it work, I was not cleared to know what it would be used for. Other stuff I knew exactly what it was.
As far as the eclipse....I agree that the partial is interesting but not a huge deal. I have seen several partials. The total,
is more of a deal. Here are two pics, three minutes apart. One is in about the middle of totality, the other is just
barely past. The camera autoexposure corrected, so the light change is even greater than it appears.
The second is with the slightest sliver of sun visible, but it is still about like a high thin overcast day, bright
and "sunny". That was the huge difference compared to the partials where the apparent brightness
only appears to be only very slightly changed from no obscuration to 95% obscuration. Note that dark, sharp
shadows with about 1 or2% of the sun uncovered. That tiny sliver still puts out a lot of light.
That circle of light on the ground in the darker one is from a tiny one AAA flashlight that I
was using to set the camera to "auto" during the totality, after removing the dark filter.
These are time lapse from a GoPro that I set up on top of the car.
Bill