Lee Lead Hardness Tester

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
I use the Lee hardness tester occationally. It seems to work for me. But since the process is quite operator-dependant, I take the results with a grain of salt.
But I believe I can use it to get an impression whether my new batch of alloy is about as hard as the last one.

For terminal ballistic evaluation, I prefer to shoot i an expansion medium, like water.
 

castmiester

Active Member
+1 for the LBT tester!
That Veral Smith has a whole lot of knowledge on casting and alloys! His book is a must read!
IMHO
Based on his vent lines on top of his mould blocks and recesses around the sprue plate holes with a latch, I do believe his book would be a great read !! I made a plate for my Ideal mould out of cold rolled flat bar. The sprue hole is drilled with a 1/2 inch countersink, that should keep it hot with cadence.
 

castmiester

Active Member
To me a 429421 doesn’t need expansion to work well. That said i too would avoid something like Linotype. I don’t like brittle alloy for hunting.
My primary alloy is range scrap that runs in the 2.5-3% Sb and .75 Sn range. Shot a couple black bears and 5 or so deer with it in a variety of rifles with very good results.

Dont get hung up on BHn. It is just ONE measure of a bullet.

American Handgunner article
Veral Smith was the sole proprietor and a bullet-casting genius. While the Keith bullet developed a notoriety for killing large game, Smith carried things a bit further, improving on the “Keith” design. He determined it was the nose flat that was responsible for the wound channel. The bigger the flat, the larger the wound channel.
 

Mitty38

Well-Known Member
I always file a bit off then do a scratch test with pencils. Always been close enough for me.
Measured the pencil scratch results against our set up, at work, in the lab.
Was always with in 1or 2 Kg/mm2. On 8 different samples.

If its off from the true standard a bit not worried.
My main concern is constancy. The pencil test can be done very consistently. Getting the same results for the same hardness.
If it's off a Kg/mm2 or 2, from my target HB. So be it. As long as the entire batch is the same.


If I was trying to do an exact clone of someone else's alloy.
Or a previously made alloy, then.. Maybe ...it would be more crucial to me. But if I were getting that picky I would just get the stuff Spectrometer analyzed. Then alloy accordingly. Way more factors effecting how that alloy reacts then just hardness.

I believe there is a very informative discussion on pencil testing in a forum, somewhere.
 
Last edited:

castmiester

Active Member
To me a 429421 doesn’t need expansion to work well. That said i too would avoid something like Linotype. I don’t like brittle alloy for hunting.
My primary alloy is range scrap that runs in the 2.5-3% Sb and .75 Sn range. Shot a couple black bears and 5 or so deer with it in a variety of rifles with very good results.

Dont get hung up on BHn. It is just ONE measure of a bullet.
You're saying Lino is right around what I'm casting BHN wise.......
according to the chart on Ricks article it's showing linotype being alot harder. Mine being 13BHN and the chart saying 22BHN. I can't see my tester being off that much. I just measured off the Lee chart at below at 8 BHN. Lee told me over the last increment of .079 is pure lead.

So I'm gonna say this tester is good to go.
 
Last edited:

Bronco72

New Member
Here is a link for Veral Smith's book!

Look like a fire has put an end to his mold making :embarrassed:
 

Bronco72

New Member

Close window about fire and find book in products !

Link work for me but I don't know ????

Hope this works!
 
Last edited:

Hawk

Well-Known Member
I use the LBT tester, also.
Seems to work great, but I've nothing to compare it to.
 

Dusty Bannister

Well-Known Member
I have used and like the LBT tester. I have and like the Cabin Tree tester. Very repeatable. I follow the LBT sample prep and have a bullet mold dedicated to use to cast lead samples for testing. I checked accuracy by testing lab pure samples from Bill Ferguson. Slight error at the very soft lead end, which does not bother me at all. A good and well made tool.
 

Bronco72

New Member
In their web site click on products! At the bottom of the list shown in the window is his book !

Jacketed Performance with Cast Bullets Book​

 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
Veral went and got himself old. Plus, a year or so ago his shop burnt down and put an end to mold making. I've heard (second hand) that he plans on continuing to make lube, the book or the harness tester I'm not sure of.
 

castmiester

Active Member
Veral went and got himself old. Plus, a year or so ago his shop burnt down and put an end to mold making. I've heard (second hand) that he plans on continuing to make lube, the book or the harness tester I'm not sure of.
That's a shame, I really dig his moulds. Venting for the Sprue plate, cutout on the pour holes.... really nice. Definitely want his book. Looks like you have to call for the book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.