I grew up when handgun actions fit into one of two boxes: single action or double action.
The category of double action included anything that had a double action capability, even if it was predominately shot in single action, like a CZ-75 or a Walther P-38.
That was a nice, well defined world. Then along came Glock. The Glock didn't really fit into either of those two categories. The trigger had a lot of travel and was heavier than a conventional SA trigger but it wasn't really a conventional DA trigger either. It didn't really fit nicely into one of the two "boxes" [SA or DA].
Now, I never hated the Glock but it took me a few years to warm up to the concept. When I finally set aside all of my preconceived notions and just shot the damn thing - I realized that the trigger wasn't all that critical. Yeah, it didn't have that crisp 1911 SA pull but I could score hits with it just as well. The trigger pull just wasn't all that important.
I have shot double action revolvers for as long as I can remember. I rarely place a DA revolver into single action mode. I have a lot of DA revolvers that have absolutely NO single action mode. They are Double Action Only. [DAO]. I have never considered DAO to be an impediment. In fact, I often prefer DAO.
I see people that buy DA revolvers and then never shoot them in double action. Did they just want a single action revolver with a swing out cylinder? Do they want DA capability "just in case" they need it but they never practice in DA?
Char-Gar hit the nail on the head, If you can release the trigger and keep the sights on target - All Is Good.
It's easy to lose perspective.