Mitty38
Well-Known Member
I see what you are getting at. I was destroying all the work I was doing to fit the bullet to the gun.
Ok, bunch of questions here......
However, once you got below the point you were leaving a ring of lead in the chamber, would not a gas check have helped get a more accurate round without leading, at those loads?????
Say, If I sized a little smaller then .311, say .310. Gas checked and seated back with a slightly harder bullet ,I am guessing I could have made it work at 12 to 13 grains .
I would be losing the advantage of getting accuracy at a lowed velocity, and chances are I would not be getting as good MOA. Because shape shifting would still be a prominent factor??
Would it probably, no matter what the lube, most defiantly lead enough to throw a wild shot now and again?
I know I would be spending twice as much on powder. And eventually putting more wear and tear on my rifle with my practice rounds.
Ok, bunch of questions here......
However, once you got below the point you were leaving a ring of lead in the chamber, would not a gas check have helped get a more accurate round without leading, at those loads?????
Say, If I sized a little smaller then .311, say .310. Gas checked and seated back with a slightly harder bullet ,I am guessing I could have made it work at 12 to 13 grains .
I would be losing the advantage of getting accuracy at a lowed velocity, and chances are I would not be getting as good MOA. Because shape shifting would still be a prominent factor??
Would it probably, no matter what the lube, most defiantly lead enough to throw a wild shot now and again?
I know I would be spending twice as much on powder. And eventually putting more wear and tear on my rifle with my practice rounds.
Last edited: