Some old Photos for your enjoyment

KeithB

Resident Half Fast Machinist
Front wheel drive is the major reason I have owned several Chrysler/Dodge minivans. Not what I would recommend for towing but otherwise fine for traction. Much better than a rear wheel drive/front engine vehicle with all the weight over the non-driving wheels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian

Bret4207

At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
Tupper, is that where Tupperware comes from?
Nope, but Rubbermaid, or at least part of it, came from Ogdensburg NY. Tupper Lake was a logging down in the central Adirondacks. Used to be a pretty rough and tumble town. The big industry was the Oval Wood Dish Company and if you ever ate salad out of a wooden bowl back in the 40's-70's it might well have come from there. Later they made all the straws (plastic) for McDonalds. Tupper;s logging days pretty much died off in the 90's due to things I'm not supposed to talk about here. Sad, sad thing to see.
 

Rockydoc

Well-Known Member
Nope, but Rubbermaid, or at least part of it, came from Ogdensburg NY. Tupper Lake was a logging down in the central Adirondacks. Used to be a pretty rough and tumble town. The big industry was the Oval Wood Dish Company and if you ever ate salad out of a wooden bowl back in the 40's-70's it might well have come from there. Later they made all the straws (plastic) for McDonalds. Tupper;s logging days pretty much died off in the 90's due to things I'm not supposed to talk about here. Sad, sad thing to see.
RUBBERMAID I made a ground stand shooting house from a Rubbermaid utility shed 4x8x8, the kind used for storage of lawnmowers, shovels, rakes, etc. It could accommodate two shooters in close comfort. Many deer were harvested from there. Many a youngster got their
first deer sitting there beside me in that stand. We lost it to a hurricane. It had been so successful that my son built a more permanent replacement of lumber and plywood.
 

richhodg66

Well-Known Member
This was captioned "Women learn to shoot, 1915" which seems accurate, but leaves a lot out. Can anyone identify the rifles they are using? At first, I thought Mosin Nagants, which would make sense as they were produced in America and many stayed here in training roles after 1917, but the first one looks to have a different bolt handle profile?
Women Shooters 1915.jpg
 

L Ross

Well-Known Member
Not sure but looking right behind their left hands I see protruding magazines. How about an 1891 Carcano?
 
Last edited:

richhodg66

Well-Known Member
Not sure but looking right behind their left hands I see protruding magazines. How about an 1891 Carcano?
I had not thought about Carcanos, you may well be right. Seems I have seen very few Carcanos in original condition.

I'm no expert on such things by a long shot, but the styling of the ladies' clothing seem to make me think America or Britain but I could be way off.

The comment about eye and ear protection is noted. I have some hearing loss from the time in the Army like just about everybody who does a career has. I teach high schoolers and it seems we have conditioned kids that raising their voices is a bad thing and they almost whisper when asking something. Seems like I'm constantly telling them to sound off. I'm OK in a quite setting, sitting on a tree stand in the woods I can hear all kinds of stuff but if there is background noise, I'm in trouble.

Wear your ear muffs, guys.
 

Missionary

Well-Known Member
I lost 50% of my right ear when the tank next to mine cut loose a 105 heat round (blue practice) at FT Hood in 72. During a ease fire !
I was half way up out the loaders hatch. Muzzle blast threw me to the turret floor. I had removed right earplug to ear something in the turret when traversing.
Never wondered again about firing the main gun near ground troops again..
 

richhodg66

Well-Known Member
I was an artilleryman, but I don't think it was the guns that did it as much as the times I was an FDO or FSO and had to spend a lot of time in a M577 with a big diesel motor and/or four deuce generator going while trying to minitor four or five radio nets at once.

For what it's worth, when I was real young, I spent a lot of time around 4.2" mortars back in my 3rd ACR days. I swear, one of those is a lot roughre on the ears than a 155 was unless they were shooting one of the really heavy charges. It was more of a metallic sounds that just seemed to hurt.
 

Jeff H

NW Ohio
...........I teach high schoolers and it seems we have conditioned kids that raising their voices is a bad thing and they almost whisper when asking something...

DRIVES ME NUTS!

I spend three times more time making students repeat themselves than I do asking the original question!

"MUMBLE LOUDER!" IS MY USUAL REPLY, TWO AND THREE TIMES.

And they don't just whisper-mumble, the they whisper-mumble into their chest and try hard not to move their lips or face you when they speak.

I do know that my hearing sucks. Yeah, probably the cheesy 'plugs the Army gave me, in conjunction with the high-pitched whine of a blown, three-cylinder diesel on the Gamma-Goat, M16s, M2s, M60s, 81mm mortars, 4.2" mortars and those damned Howitzers we stood in front of once a year for Division pass and review. Oh, no gawdy, orange ear-plugs allowed for that particular event.

Sorry. Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks that "kids these days" (under 50) WON'T speak up! In a LAB with lousy accoustics and a really noisy, antiquated air-handling system too. Anyway, in t hree semesters, I STILL can't break them of that habit.

Yeah, I was thinking Carnanos too.
 

richhodg66

Well-Known Member
Part of the problem is that we really have conditioned kids in our society that anything assertive is threatening to someone, so God forbid you should actually raise your voice. I spend a lot of time coaching my air rifle shooters and it's a poured concrete room with nothing to absorb sound and shile shooting is going on (a Crossman Challenger PCP rifle you can barely hear in a large gym sounds like a real gun on our range) I have to practically get in their face to hear and understand when they ask a question.
 

JonB

Halcyon member
I thought those rifles looked like Brit rifles, mostly due to the Mag, BUT I am not familiar with the 1888 Lee Medford...do they use similar Mag?